Showing posts with label Ian Hendry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ian Hendry. Show all posts

Saturday, March 21, 2020

Get Carter (1971)

Saturday is "Take Out The Trash" Day.

  Get Carter (Mike Hodges, 1971) In 2004, BFI Magazine conducted a poll of British film critics of what was the greatest British film of all time.

Out of all British films, the work of Lean and early Hitchcock, The Archers, Carol Reed, Tony Richardson, Ken Russell, the output of Alexander Korda and Ealing Studios and Hammer and Rank, the critics chose Get Carter, a decidedly off-beat and down-beat gangster film that anticipated the odd-ball and ultra-violent Christmas releases of 1971, by 9 months.*

It was the first film of director Mike Hodges, hired at the behest of a producer trying to make a film that would capitalize on the recent conviction of British gangsters, the Kray brothers. Hodges didn't set his film in London, but in the north, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, shooting it almost documentary style, employing locals as extras, and the gangsters aren't robbers, they're integrated into society, supplying the citizenry what they want in vice and taking their cut. There is no law enforcement to be seen and the hoods work in the open, comfortable in their position in society.
Carter reads Raymond Chandler on his way home to Newcastle.
He must think of it as a romance novel.
Jack Carter (Michael Caine) is taking the train from London to his old home-town of Newcastle to arrange and attend his brother Frank's funeral, Frank's death being the result of a drunk-driving accident, officially. Jack isn't buying any of that. Jack, you see, is in the employ of the Fletcher Brothers gang out of London, and he suspects brother Frank was murdered and his other intent to go to Newcastle is to arrange and attend the killing of those responsible. This does not sit well with the Fletcher boys, who want Jack around taking care of their business, so they send out a couple of boys to bring Jack back.
Either that, or they've found out that he's been sleeping with Gerald Fletcher's girlfriend, Anna (Britt Ekland) and plans on running away with her to South America when he returns. Maybe they want to have a "talk" with him before then. It might be that, it might be that he's taken time off from his work for their gang and you just don't do that to the Fletcher's. More than once, anyway.
But, travel, he does, reading Raymond Chandler's "Farewell, My Lovely," perhaps as a primer on how to be a detective trying to solve a mystery, something a bit more intricate and nuanced than being an enforcer/hit-man for the mob. And he will have to be a detective: the story he unfolds is complicated with agendas that are hidden as well as obvious, as crime happens out in the open and is part of the fabric of day-to-day Newcastle—as far afield as one could get from the London that had become familiar to audiences of the Swinging '60's—it's not psychedelia and mini-skirts and free-wheeling poshness, but grubby and constricting and hiding in the shadows.
The plot is as convoluted as a Chandler novel, and with family just as embedded in the gears of it. At the funeral, Jack meets Frank's mistress (the last of them, anyway) Margaret (Dorothy White), and his own niece Doreen (Petra Markham), Frank's daughter (although, even that's unclear). They give him an added incentive, certainly, but, as Jack digs deeper, he finds the task more labyrinthine with players, subterfuge, hidden motives, and where he becomes the convenient means to others' ends in the midst of turf-wars and long-held vendettas. Jack leaves a bloody trail of bodies in his path to vengeance, cutting a swath through the Newcastle underworld, to the point where he himself becomes a target for his bosses, who send a couple of underlings to bring him back, dead or alive not a consideration given his activities.
But, they're just another road-block on his hunt, and although he might be an efficient and remorseless killer, the very fact that he's so committed to his task reveals that he has one weakness—family. And his distance and isolation in London has kept him from knowing the seamier sides of his brother's past, from which no one is left untarnished. If Carter starts out with any sentimentality before getting to Newcastle, he loses it the deeper he digs and the closer he gets to the truth.
Conversely, the scope of his work expands to the point where it is not enough to deal with his brother's killer (or killers), but also to set up and exact revenge on the whole network of criminality through planted evidence and black-mail, reaching up to its highest ranks in Cyril Kinnear (played in an eccentric performance by playwright John Osborne), using evidence he's found along the way and using—of all people—the police to handle the more difficult work.
One wonders where Carter thinks this all headed—yes, he's planning on retiring to South America with Anna (and maybe niece Doreen)—but he acts with such a pitiless ruthlessness that one wonders if he actually can make a plan more than one target away. His defection from the Fletchers for his "personal time" and his dalliance with Anna will surely make him a perpetual target. If he's capable of such dogged retribution, wouldn't they be as well?
Get Carter is a tough film to follow, given the number of players involved in the web of criminality that finally did in brother Frank, but eventually it comes down to just latching onto Caine's Avenging Devil and holding on tight, the surrounding characters aren't going to last very long, anyway, and given their lack of screen-time, there's no danger of attachment, even if any of them were in the slightest bit sympathetic. One almost needs a Newcastle map to keep track of it.
Hodges isn't much of a help. This is his first film and one can see that he's trying to maintain the threads of the story and the many characters by any means necessary. Every so often, there's a wonderful shot that neatly framed and composed for both atmosphere and efficient exposition. But, a lot of the time, it feels a bit slap-dash, even random, as if Hodges were trying to make something off-beat but with no underlying story-telling need behind it, lest any veneer betray the location work and the underlying seediness of the story.
There would be no sequel. But, there would be a remake in 2000, directed by Stephen Kay and starring Sylvester Stallone (with a cameo by Caine, of all people). One wonders why, if this film is held in such high regard, it was even necessary. The second had that polish that I profess missing, but even that doesn't make it a better film than the original. 

* Really. Does anyone wonder how Brexit happened?


Thursday, March 31, 2016

Get Off the Lawn, You "Damned" Kids!

Village of the Damned (Wolfe Rilla, 1960)  Based on the John Wyndham sci-fi novel "The Midwich Cukoos," adapted by Stirling Silliphant and director Rilla, Village of the Damned* is a curious mixture of sci-fi and horror—a combination of pulp sensibilities, but with a strange sub-text that could be taken as religious, mystical, or invasive, and then has the audacity to not answer any of the questions and leave you hanging as the suppositions swirl through your head. Both it and its sequel are fascinating things to watch, but each in their different way.

In the town of Midwich, professor Gordon Zellaby (George Sanders) is making a call to his brother-in-law Alan Bernard (Michael Gwynn) when all of a sudden, he falls unconscious. So does the family dog. Bernard is alarmed at this and can't raise anyone in town, so he investigates and being in the military he doesn't do it subtly. What he finds is that everyone within a few mile radius of city center is unconscious...or will become unconscious (even taking preventative measures like gas-masks) if they enter within that "zone"—aeroplanes flying overhead will have their pilots drop off, the planes crashing.  

It's a mystery
. Why this town? Why this effect? But, two hours later, everyone awakens, mystified. They felt a cold sensation before they dropped, but that was it. The disturbance is forgotten.


Until two months later, when it's determined that every woman "of child-bearing years" in Midwich is pregnant. For Zellaby and his wife (Barbara Shelley), it's a miracle though it's a little late in life for him. But, for the unmarried women in town, and for the women with husbands away, it's not only embarrassing, it has to be some bizarre mistake...and when it's confirmed it makes things uncomfortable, socially. For awhile they're stigmatized, but before long (and with the doctor's confirmation) it's determined that all the women are pregnant...and they don't how.

Out of this mass-immaculate conception, the village is seriously creeped out, but the children appear to be normal, if gestating at an accelerated rate. And all are born on the same night, all premature by normal standards, but all around ten pounds, all with white shocks of hair and something "weird" about their eyes, totally black. The kids grow quickly and they learn quickly, being able to figure out chinese puzzle boxes while still toddlers. Give it to one, and then another, sight unseen, will be able to figure it out, as if by telepathy or shared mental faculties.

And...if things don't go their way, they can influence the thoughts and actions of others, an act apparent when their eyes begin to glow white. The children, as they grow older and become more sophisticated, become even odder—walking as a group by themselves, dressing themselves, speaking in a tone, sophisticated and cold.**

What to do about them...and who "is" them, anyway? No one has any answers, but reports around the world suggest Midwich isn't the only village on Earth to experience this. Some of the places have murdered the children. One isolated village in Russia is trying to instruct the children to the best they can. What is the answer: to eradicate, or to exploit? 

The military doesn't want to do anything subtle, but Zellaby, with doubts as to their origin, staves off their eradication by seeing if he can teach them in their own segregated school (naturally). The trouble is, the children don't want to do anything subtle, either, and these kids are of a mind to stop the problem of bullying by any means necessary.
This is a great film, which doesn't shirk societal issues at the same time it doesn't pin down exactly what the hell is going on here. The fact is the kids are here and dealing must begin. But how, never mind why. Plus, it's a genuine horror-fest, making one web-site's list of "10 movies pregnant women should never watch."
*** Apt. And one curious anomaly about the film is that the strange glowing eyes that signal some heavy brain-work on the part of the children (and figures in the denouement) is only seen in American prints of the film. Interesting, as they seem to appear in the British posters for the film.

But, those curiosities aside, it's well-worth seeing, and pondering.  
 
One further note, young Martin Stephens who gives such a calmly mature performance as little David Zellaby in this (and The Innocents) left acting while still a child and became an architect. Yes, he has a web-site.

°° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° 
Children of the Damned (Anton M. Leader, 1964) If Village of the Damned leaves things unexplained, Children of the Damned just complicates the issue, rather than coming up with any concrete answers. The six titular children have the same powers and intellect, but not the same attributes. None of them has the tell-tale white hair or the slightly high browline as the first crop of kids. And there's only one child from Britain; the others, flown in by the UN, come from Russia, China, India, America, and Nigeria and their abilities are only discovered by a UNESCO survey on child development. The lead investigators in England, psychiatrist Tom Llewelynn (Ian Hendry) and geneticist Dr. David Neville (Alan Badel, laconically ironic) are looking into the why's and wherefore's of young Paul Looren (Clive Powell), a child of extraordinary learning skills that are frankly off their charts. A visit to his single mother only ends with her tossing them out and their disbelief in her claiming she was never "touched by a man."
Llewelynn and Neville make an odd duck duo,
**** the shrink earnest and straightforward and the geneticist cracking wise with every line. Their investigations come up with no reason why these kids have these abilities, they just do, and when Britain's Secret Service tries to take control of young Paul, he sets up a distraction and scampers, seeking out the other five children and taking up residence in an abandoned church, with Paul's aunt (Barbara Ferris) as hostage/mouthpiece. The various embassies want each of their children back to exploit them, weaponizing them, in effect. Llewlynn is thunderstruck by the idiocy of that: "As soon as one of them knows your plan, then the others will know it." So much for Cold War secrets.

Neville and Llewelynn, U.N. observers...observing
Still the various countries want their kids back, and the kids want nothing of it, attacking from their stronghold in the church, devising a broadcasting "thingie" using the church's pipe-organ to incapacitate anyone attempting to remove them, leaving their attackers dead or "wishing they were."

Children of the Damned is slightly diminished from its original, but on its own is one of those great science fiction films of limited scope and budget that still manages to evoke the sense of a much larger concept, despite narrowing down what the children "are," while giving the film a sense of cautionary tragedy that the first film doesn't have.  Less a horror film than a story of sociological and political paranoia, Children of the Damned features good performances and an efficiently crackling script (by John Briley—he would go on to write Cry Freedom and Gandhi) and manages to stand on its own terms, apart from the first film, as an entertaining, if very unsettling film.

...and what they're observing. 
°° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °° °°

Village of the Damned (John Carpenter, 1995) This updated version of the original follows the same plot structure of the first, with less emphasis on the mysterious circumstances that cause the "immaculate" pregnancies in the town of "Midwich, California," less stigma—it is the '90's, after all, there's even the subject, given the circumstances, of aborting the children—and more emphasis on the children and the violence they mete out on the town. In color, and sporting a good cast of stars (with Christopher Reeve—his last role before his crippling riding accident—Linda Kozlowski—she of the "Crocodile Dundee" series—Michael Paré, Mark Hamill and Kristie Alley), these kids are more pointedly accusatory, speak in archly threatening whispers,***** and action-oriented, and unusually vicious in the way they have their victims destroy themselves—impaled on a broom, blinding an eye-doctor, having one of the parents driving into a propane tank (rather than a brick wall), another performs an autopsy on herself, and the botched military intervention in another country alluded to in the first film is dutifully played out with all the blood-bags the budget can allow—and Carpenter doesn't cut away as the original did. There's no implication here, which (as it usually is) isn't as powerful as leaving your audience's squirming imagination to do the dirty work. 
Christopher Reeve's doctor hates talking to kids.
On the plus side, it's less of a man's world this time out on both sides: the chief investigator of the phenomenon is a woman (Alley, whose a bit cavalier in her dealing with the kids) and the leader of the children is one of the little girls, Mara (Lindsey Haun) daughter of Reeve's local physician and his wife (Karen Kahn).
This time out, the children pair off, boy-girl, with one of the children (Tom Dekker) left partnerless because one of the children is stillborn, and, as a result, being the only one to develop any empathy at all. The other kids are little monsters who, when forced to go up against an adult with any will at all, will have the pinwheels in their glowing eyes go from green to red to white, then, just to stack the deck against them further, their faces glow red into a demon's visage.
In other words, what was subtle and thought-provoking in the first film doesn't have the same effect in this one. And the reason is you're being beaten over the head with it, and rather pointlessly. There's no ambiguity here. There's no mystery. It's just a simple formula: strange is bad=kill it. Carpenter can be a good film-maker and stylist—he wrote the playbook on the post-Hitchcock slasher film (which may not be much of a recommendation—until you compare it with his imitators). Maybe this was just a case of studio expectations for meeting a carnage quotient. But whatever it is, the 1995 remake of the Village of the Damned takes all the fun...and the seriousness out of the story.

And that's a "Damned" shame.


* There is another film done by the Hammer group, and directed by American director Joseph Losey, starring McDonald Carey and Oliver Reed called (depending on which version you see) These are the Damned or The Damned, and are unrelated to this film series, although it does involve children, with special qualities.

** It was odd watching it this time around, as the children, particularly Martin Stephens, reminded me of no one so much as Sheldon Cooper, Jim Parson's character on "The Big Bang Theory."  Sorry, DR. Sheldon Cooper.
 
*** That article has met its internet death, and with the recent glut of horror films since, Village of the Damned has been knocked off the Top 10 List...but it's still on IMDB's list on the topic...where it's 29.

**** And no, I don't think they're gay, even if they do share a flat in London (separate rooms, mind you).  Both are on assignment from Unesco in London.


***** Unfortunately, the kids' performances are melodramatically threatening, a bit like Patty McCormick in The Bad Seed.