Wednesday, April 16, 2025

The Alto Knights

De Niro 17 (And Just Beside Himself)
or
Keep Your Friends Close and Your Enemies Closer (Tough to Do When They're One and the Same)
 
It wasn't the stunt-casting of Robert De Niro in the two lead roles that made me want to see The Alto Knights. It was that this property had been "in the works" since the 1970's (when it was known as "Wise Guys"), being produced by legendary producer Irwin Winkler (who is now 93), with a script by Nicholas Pileggi (he wrote the screenplays and source-books for Goodfellas, Casino, as well as writing City Hall and executive producing American Gangster) and directed by Barry Levinson—who started out writing for Tim Conway, "The Carol Burnett Show", Mel Brooks, and directed such films as Diner, The Natural, Rain Man, Good Morning, Vietnam and his previous gangster movie, Bugsy. Levinson was the draw for me and considering the amazing work he's done in the past—he also executive-produced "Homicide: Life on the Street", a personal favorite—that was more than enough reason.

The Alto Knights tells the story of the Luciano mob family that went from bootlegging during Prohibition to gambling, and controlling criminal activities in Manhattan's Lower East Side. It concentrates on the relationship between Frank Costello, Luciano's consigliere and Vito Genovese, the gang's underboss, who grew up as friends but became bitter rivals once they achieved higher status in the Mafia. And it covers the time from when Costello ran the mob to the helter-skelter Apalachin meeting, the "mob convention" so flagrant that even the FBI's J. Edgar Hoover finally had to admit that organized crime actually existed (why he never had before has been an unexplained mystery).
If you've seen The Godfather, the story will have echoes of the same gun-fire—author Mario Puzo used details and scrambled them for his novel—but, at one point, Genovese (who'd been put in charge of Luciano's mob after its head was sent to prison for running a prostitution operation) fled to Sicily to avoid a murder charge, and was replaced with Costello. Costello and Luciano had deep contacts with New York politicians, and, with Costello in charge, it was easier to get away with murder. 
But when Genovese returned to America in 1945—witnesses to the murder had been very conveniently murdered before any trial could take place—the re-patriated mobster assumed that Luciano would put him back in charge, but, instead, Costello kept himself as the mob's boss, making him an enemy in the mercurial, less steady Genovese's eyes and for the rest of their lives the two stayed bitter rivals. 
The film chronicles that rivalry—from Costello's point of view, so it's more than a bit prejudiced—picking through pages of Mob history back and forth in time in flashback, beginning with the most obvious example of their rivalry, the botched assassination of Costello by Genovese's son on his Dad's orders (Genovese was never said to be subtle). It's that act that convinces the more strategic Costello to retire from the mob, but not without some manipulation of the volatile Genovese. Of course, it's all from Costello's self-sympathetic view of things. But, the film also has Genovese's wild divorce trial, the killing of Costello's hand-picked successor Alberto Anastasia, the Senate hearings of Estes Kefauver, and that ill-fated Mob convention.
Pileggi and Levinson keep it moving and some of the set-pieces are nicely conceived, with the director sometimes evoking Edward Hopper paintings (as he has done in the pas) this time with the aid of 81 year old cinematographer Dante Spinotti
So, since he's all over the movie, is De Niro any good? I mean, at playing two different characters in the same movie? Yeah, it's quite the show. Early on in the movie De Niro takes pains to separate the two personas—his Costello is more soft-spoken and cagey-eyed, while his Vito Genovese spits out his dialog and has a nervous energy (it's almost like De Niro is doing an impression of Joe Pesci). And the few scenes where the two characters are together and De Niro is literally beside himself, it's something of a wonder as the dialog flows naturally but the two characters interrupt each other, react to the others' accusations and gives the impression that, hey, this is two different guys here having a rather diffident conversation with each other (but it's the same actor doing both parts!). I have no idea why they did this (I've read that it was Warner CEO David Zaslav's), but it's an amazing to see. 
And, really, who is De Niro going to play against? Who has the caliber to go toe to toe with him? Pacino, maybe (but they've made a pact that they're not going to do anything together unless it's really good). Alec Baldwin would have been an interesting choice and quite capable. But, watching De Niro play two different characters...with two different energies...is a fascinating exercise. That he pulls it off (despite never fully convincing us that it isn't a "twins" act) impresses. "Molto rispotto."
But, any gangster movie is going to have that weird quality of upside-down absurdism (Costello wants to retire and lead a "normal" life...really?), which Levinson, with his comedy background, leans into heavily. The thing that's missing is any sense of moral outrage. These were gangsters, after all. Their day-to-day illegal activities are mentioned ("just business") and prominent assassinations are portrayed (because "if it bleeds, it leads"), but like Levinson's Bugsy, there isn't the sensibilities of penance being paid that you'd find in Catholic filmmakers like Scorsese or Coppola. For the criminal record, Genovese died in prison, while Costello died in his retirement penthouse at the Waldorf Astoria. A lot of their victims, we'll never know.
Frank Costello and Vito Genovese mug shots
 

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

The Friend (2024)

White Ghost/Sad Pony
or
"What's Going To Happen To The Dog?"

As soon as it's over, you want to watch The Friend again. It's that good, with a literate script, masterful performances (from everybody, not just Naomi Watts and Bill Murray...or the dog, Bing), New York as a background, an intricately selected soundtrack, and the least anthropomorphic animal performance I've seen in a long time.

And, it's a "dog" movie.

I hate "dog" movies, usually. You know why. The dog always seems to die at the end, usually in the dramatic interest of teaching the film's protagonist a life-lesson of great import. Like "life is a gift" or "appreciate what you've got when you've got it." Blah-de-blah-de-blah. I'm cynical of the form because I hate to cry in theaters and beating me with a dead dog turns me into a blubbering wreck and I hate to throw away all the soggy popcorn. The one time I didn't was when John Wick's dog was murdered and that it inspired him to come out of assassination retirement (which I giggled at, finding it perversely ludicrous).
But, this one I rushed to see because, well, 
Naomi Watts and Bill Murray are in it and their taste in parts alone should sell it, some laudatory words online were mentioned, and it's based on a Booker prize-winning novel by Sigrid Nunez. All indications were for some good breeding of a project that was low-key and mildly amusing. I wasn't prepared for a great movie, but I got it in spades.
It starts with a moment of inspiration, which we're not privy to: successful author-teacher Walter Mitchell (Murray) is out on his morning "Two Bridges" jog when he sees something that delights him, but we cut away before we see what has animated him so. We see him at a dinner party where he is holding court, volubly telling the story of his discovery. By the next scene, he is dead—by his own hand, they say*—and the survivors are left wondering how such a thing could happen. What would the world be without Walter? There were so many projects in the air, so many things left undone, and he'd just met his grown daughter whom he—or any of his wives, past or present—never knew existed.

But, hardest hit seems to be Iris (Watts), ostensibly his best friend. Walter was her mentor (currently she's working on a book of his correspondence) and she, in turn, is mentoring his new/old daughter, collaborating on the book. Progress on it has been slow but, now, work on it—like Walter—has come to a screeching halt.
Walter's widow (Noma Dumezweni) has asked Iris to come see her and she has a request. Well, more of a bequest—Walter had asked that if anything happened to him that Iris should take care of his dog, Apollo, the creature that he encountered on that morning run.
"Apollo" is a 150 lb. Great Dane and Iris weighs quite a bit less and is only half-again taller. Plus, Iris' apartment is, what they call in New York, a "studio" but it could be a "prewar", but anywhere else it would be called "cramped" and if you were selling it you'd mention "simplicity" and "ease of maintenance". In no way would it be considered a kennel, and—besides—it's in a "No Pets Allowed" building. Iris is not keen on the idea and her "go-to" is to avoid the Super as long as she can and find a place to "re-home" Apollo. But, in the meantime, she picks up the dog at its temporary kennel to take to what she hopes is its temporary home in her apartment only to find that the brute jumps on her bed and spreads out, despite her protests. His forlorn look prompts Iris' neighbor to remark "There's a PONY on your bed! A SAD pony!"
A sad pony to be sure, but also the elephant in the room. Apollo is just too big to fit into her apartment without obstructing Iris' every movement. She capitulated by pulling an air mattress out of her closet and sleeping on the floor, Apollo's sad eyes never leaving her through the night. But, the two are bonded, despite the separate bed-places in that they're both grieving—she for her mentor, he for his master. One's a human, one's a dog; she's a loner, he's a pack animal, so they're both approaching each other from separate corners. And with all the inconvenience this big white ghost causes in her life, some accommodation needs to be reached, some compromise between these two living beings who've been left behind.
And, ultimately, value.
The Friend, unlike so many "dog movies", is what the AARP magazine likes to call 
"Movies for Grownups". The emotions are complicated and recognizable, and maybe over some folks' heads. But, a New Yorker will recognize the panic of possibly losing a rent-controlled apartment; an older person will recognize the paralysis of grief; a real dog-owner will understand the inconvenience of pet-ownership** ...beyond the dog-movie-cliché antics of four-legged tornado-damage to the feng shui. There are no easy-laugh slobber jokes. This one is about loss, responsibility, and mutual need. And a bit about survivor's guilt. And the usual "taking care of others is more fulfilling than taking care of yourself." And Watts and Murray are brilliant in this.
It's so good and funny and wise that you immediately want to see it again. Or, better yet, read the book to get all the good stuff they couldn't make room for. Sometimes, that's the best part.

* I suppose with the mention of it, I should give the number of the Suicide and Crisis Hotline—If you or a loved one are having emotional distress or thoughts of suicide, call 988 to connect with a lifeline specialist for support.but DOGE only knows if it still exists. From what I've been able to access online, it does. 
 
** The other day something popped up in my news-feed that still makes me laugh: "Nobody has ever said 'What this house needs is a box-full of shit. Let's get a cat!'"

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Don't Make a Scene: Tombstone

The Story: Latin at five paces.
 
So, we lost Val Kilmer. But, he'll always be around because his movies will be around, and in some cases they'll be evergreen because his performance in them made them such.
 
Like Tombstone, one of the "Wyatt Earp" movies that came out around the first half of the 1990's (studios have projects in stasis and when they hear another studio might make a similar movie, they dust off their old script and try to beat the rival to the box-office). Tombstone was first out of the gate and did very well, despite a troubled production—screenwriter Kevin Jarre was directing, but his pace wasn't considered practical and so he was replaced with the very quick (but sometimes at a cost) George P. Cosmatos.
 
Even if the product looked a little "jinky" at times—sometimes people aren't looking at the folks they're talking to, and it even happens in this scene—you had to admire the script (although it did adhere to the old "O.K. Corral" mythology) and Val Kilmer's eccentric performance as "Doc" Holliday.
 
It changes over the course of the movie, it starts being still and measured, but as the movie rolls on, a little more of Kilmer's wicked Marlon Brando-imitation—they worked together, unhappily, on The Island of Dr. Moreau—starts creeping in, and for some reason, it just works and works well. In fact, despite a great performance by Kurt Russell in the lead, Kilmer seemed to walk away with the movie.
 
He could be absolutely amazing, and it's sorry to see him go.
 
The Set-up: Wyatt (Kurt Russell), Virgil (Sam Elliott) and Morgan Earp (Bill Paxton) have settled down in Tombstone, Arizona where they set up stakes in a gambling salon, but Wyatt is informed by his friend "Doc" Holliday (Val Kilmer) that Tombstone is beset by the Cowboy gang led by "Curly Bill" Brocius (Powers Boothe) and including members of the Clanton family as well as Johnny Ringo (Michael Biehn). Their paths were bound to cross.
 
Action.
 
Doc chuckles. Suddenly Curly Bill looms over the faro table with Ringo and a drunken Ike Clanton. 
CURLY BILL
Wyatt Earp, huh? 
CURLY BILL
I heard of you.
IKE
Listen, Mr. Kansas Law-dog. 
IKE
Law Don’t go...
IKE
...around her. 
IKE
Savvy? 
WYATT
I’m retired. 
CURLY BILL
Good. 
CURLY BILL
That’s real good. 
IKE
Yeah, that’s good, Mr. Law-dog, ‘cause law don’t go around here. 
WYATT
(interrupting)Yeah, I heard you the first time.
WYATT
Winner to the King 
WYATT
five hundred dollars.
CURLY BILL
Shut up, Ike.
RINGO
(steps up to Doc) And you must be Doc Holliday. 
DOC
(coughs then casually) That’s the rumor. 
RINGO
You retired, too? 
DOC
Not me. I’m in my prime. 
RINGO
Yeah, you look it. 
DOC
And you must be Ringo. 
DOC
Look, Darling, Johnny Ringo. 
DOC
The Deadliest pistoleer...
DOC
...since Wild Bill, they say. 
DOC
What do you Think, darling? Should I hate him? 
KATE
You don’t even know him. 
DOC
Yes, that's true...
DOC
but (I don't know)...
DOC
there’s just something About him. 
DOC
Something around The eyes, 
DOC
I don’t know, 
DOC
reminds me Of… 
DOC
...me. 
DOC
No. I’m sure of it, 
DOC
I Hate him. 
WYATT
(to Ringo) He’s drunk. 
DOC
In vino veritas. (
Truth in wine)
RINGO
Age quod agis. (
Do what you do)
DOC
Credat...
DOC
..Judaeus Apella, non ego. (Let Apella the Jew believe it, but not I*.)
RINGO
(pats gun) Ecentus stultorum...
RINGO
...magister. (A brilliant teacher of fools)
DOC
(Cheshire cat smile) In pace requiescat. (
May he rest in peace)
WHITE
(enters, appeasing) Come on now. 
WHITE
We don’t want any Trouble in here. Not in any language. 
DOC
That's...
DOC
...Latin, darling. Evidently...
DOC
...
Mr. Ringo’s an educated Man. 
DOC
Now I really hate him. 
Ringo looks at Doc, holding his gaze while suddenly whipping out his .45. 
Everyone but Doc flinches.
CURLY BILL
Watch it, Johnny...
CURLY BILL
I hear he's real fast.
Ringo does a dazzling series of twirls and tricks, 
his nickel-plated pistol flashing like a blaze of silver fire, 
finally slapping it back into his holster with a flourish. 
Cheers and hoots. 
Doc rolls his eyes, 
hooks a finger through the handle of his silver cup, 
then launches into an exact duplication of Ringo’s routine using a cup instead of a gun. 
The room bursts into laughter. 
Doc shrugs. 
Ringo lets a strange little hint of a smile cross his face 
then exits with the others. 
 
 
Words by Kevin Jarre
 
 
Tombstone is available on DVD, Blu-Ray and 4K/UHD from Sony Pictures Home Entertainment

* A.I.'s good for something:  "The phrase "Apella the Jew believes not me" is a Latin saying, "credat Judaeus Apella, non ego," that translates to "Let Apella the Jew believe it, but not I." It's used to express skepticism or to dismiss something as absurd or unbelievable, according to Wiktionary. The phrase suggests that even someone considered easily believable, like "Apella the Jew," wouldn't believe the claim, implying it's ridiculous.

The expression, first used by Horace in his Satires, has become a common way to express disbelief, according to Jewish Encyclopedia.
It's also seen in the movie Tombstone, where it's used by Doc Holiday in a Latin scene, according to a Reddit thread.

In essence, "Apella the Jew believes not me" is a rhetorical device that asserts a statement's lack of credibility by suggesting even the most gullible person would not believe it.
"