Showing posts with label Carrie Fisher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carrie Fisher. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Star Wars, Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

"Long Have I Waited" (Yeah, Yeah, You're Not Special)
or
"Excellent Job, Sir." ("Terrible Job, Sir")

There is no way that Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker could live up to expectations. The expectations are parsecs high and one could not/should not think every characters' stories to be satisfactorily tied up to every fan's hopes and dreams. 

Plus, this one has to make up for a lot of dissension with Rian Johnson's Episode VIII: The Last Jedi—which I quite liked—and so rather than have things unfolding in this one, it has to fold-back, providing nostalgia while not exactly advancing things...the way that J. J. Abrams did with The Force Awakens. 

We've been teased—"Dark Rey", Kylo and Rey teaming up (again) and dueling (again), C-3PO "dying," re-purposed Carrie Fisher footage, and the Return of  Emperor Palpatine (Thank badness Ian McDiarmid has good genes), who was killed off six films (or three by regular timeline) ago, and thus negating the triumphal moment of the first (or middle) trilogy.

So, is it "The Skywalker Saga" or "The Emperor Saga"—one was hoping for the former rather than the latter.

One should at least be happy there's no new Death Star—they're happy to re-purpose an old one.


Now, it is going to be very dicey doing a summary of the film so as not to spoil the surprises—and there are jolts throughout, even though the film plays out in what one would think is a logical progression that feels organic enough that one could conclude that this was the intent from the original plot-line devised for The Force Awakens.* 
I am still not used to not hearing the 20th Century Fox Fanfare heralding the film's opening, but then I've seen the new trilogy a lot less than I've seen the old ones. It shouldn't be since the Disney take-over, but it is. But, the first words of the opening crawl does give a certain unease: "The Dead Speak!" With the passing of Carrie Fisher, those words resonate a bit more. Fisher is top-lined (for the first time in the series) and that is entirely appropriate, despite the use of discarded scenes making up the entirety of her performance—reverse shots and stand-in's make the transition a bit more organic. But, there is still a slight disconnect with her scenes, especially in dialog with other actors. Fisher's Leia spouts aphorisms and exposes just how generic lines from "Star Wars" can be.
The film starts out with Kylo Ren, nee Ben Solo (Adam Driver—jeez, he's great in this!) on the hunt for the Emperor, seeing the old Sith as a threat to his status as Supreme Commander of The First Order. First, he has to track down some googah to help him find his location on the planet of Exegol (sounds like a pharmaceutical planet), and once he does, Palpatine makes him an offer he can't refuse—kill Rey (Daisy Ridley—jeez, she's good in this), the waif Source prodigy and become Commander of The Final Order's massive Star Destroyer fleet.
(The logician in me said that 1) it's a bad deal as guys in power don't like to give up their power and 2) where the Hell did they get all those ships?! Who built them, as it would take a Sith-load of supplicants to build them...but then, this is "Star Wars" where there is sound in space, X-wings can make turns and swoop around in space, there can be such a thing as a space-ship that's a bomber, and there are things like light-speed and The Force...you gotta get rid of science in these things, which is why I see this as more in the Fantasy/Fairy Tale genre than as science-fiction).
So, where's Rey? Jedi-training with General Leia (Fisher) where she's starting to get a "bad feeling about this"—her "Force-bond" with Kylo interferes with her training, like getting phone-calls from your too-ardent boyfriend who keeps interrupting your homework with calls asking "What are you doin'?" Speaking of ardent boyfriends Finn (John Boyega—jeez, he's good in this), Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac—jeez, he's....ditto) and Chewbacca (always good, but he tugs at heart-strings a couple times here) are returning from a spy-mission that has confirmed the Emperor is still alive and his threat is real—they have to do some fancy flying to avoid First Order ships in order to get the information back to Leia (they couldn't have just hidden the information in a droid?).
So, the story revolves around Kylo trying to subvert Rey to the Dark Side, rather than kill her in order to defeat the Emperor (Golly, he really IS his grandfather's kid!), while Rey and the boys try to find a duplicate googah—it's a Sith "wayfinder" that hones in on Sith energy or something—so that the Resistance can find the Emperor and defeat the Phantom Menace (to coin a phrase).
So, that's the plot—which is basically the plot of Episodes IV-VI, one generation once-removed—with the customary serial-formula of a fight or a chase every ten minutes. The first half-hour is editorially compressed into a short-hand of highlights, so that the film-makers can squeeze enough story-line into the movie and keep it under 3 hours, but one has to say that gripes and plot-holes don't appear like a force-ghost in your head until after the movie is over. That means the movie is doing it's job. It's "Star Wars", after all, the thing is supposed to be a crowd-pleaser.
Many of the established characters are given short-shrift—as if serving as convenient plot-points in earlier movies had exhausted their possibilities—except for the ones mentioned. And there are new characters, including a sort-of love-interest for Poe in Zorii Bliss (Keri Russell—jeez, I can't tell if she's good or not!) and a new disposable General for the First Order named Pryde (Richard E. Grant, sneering appropriately), who you just know is going to goeth before The Fall. There is quite an amazing array of others in the movie that you'll hear, but not see, that—for me—was kind of a thrill. C-3PO (Anthony Daniels) is given a beefier part and, for once, he has a good reason to be annoying.
The special effects are quite amazing, if cluttered, and there are a variety of planets in various eco-systems, that you might as well just forget because nobody spends much time on them for very long.
And Lando's back. Big plus. Billy Dee Williams is older than Methuselah now, but he has lost none of his charm.

But, then, all the actors are on their "A-game" here—as I've been making a joke of. Everybody does a good job, but some of the interactions between actors are the best-timed I've seen in the series, zipping along like in a Howard Hawks screwball comedy. This is their last shot at this and everybody in front of the camera gives it their all, especially in scenes that must have been conceptually hard to play. Brava!
So, yes, take the "fan-service" talk with a grain of salt—there has always been a bit of it where "Star Wars" is concerned, starting with The Empire Strikes Back. It's a bit like criticizing a duck because it floats. You can...but why? I would've liked to have see a little more about the democratizing of The Force (ala The Last Jedi), although there's a variant of it here (that might have been convenient in earlier episodes...!), but it gets the writers out of several jams, so...amazing thing, that "Force," midi-chlorians or no.
So "fan-service," yeah. But, with this closer, it does bring to mind what Lucas envisioned for the last trilogy, where the victorious Rebels lose their way allowing for a new Empire to spring up in a circular variation of the Episode I -III trilogy. And as in the line attributed to Mark Twain "history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes." That rhyming becomes more than apparent in The Rise of Skywalker, paralleling what has come before in a manner of playing out.
That feels real. And is sure as the setting of twin suns.

* One could think that, but the fact is they were making it up as they went along—Ben Kenobi wasn't supposed to die in A New Hope (that was revised during shooting), most of Return of the Jedi was recycled from original New Hope treatments. These are stories, not reality. People make them up.

Friday, December 15, 2017

Star Wars: Episode VIII The Last Jedi

Buying Time
or
"Everything You Just Said is Wrong."

"Darth Vader CAN'T be Luke Skywalker's father! Obi-Wan Kenobi said Darth Vader murdered Luke's father, so that would make Obi-Wan Kenobi a LIAR! Irvin Kershner has destroyed the Star Wars franchise!!" 
Said by absolutely no one...ever in 1980

The eighth episode of the linear Star Wars saga is out, written and directed by Rian Johnson this time, but it is the second of a traditional trilogy in this series, as are The Empire Strikes Back and Attack of the Clones, so, by design, it is darker, raising stakes and setting expectations for a third act, which will wrap up its story. 

But, it also has another function—it buys time, changing up some things, filling in some back-story, doing some adjustments, complications, and generally, teasing for a last act, where—if the past is any indication—they will cram in some necessary bit of information to careen to a conclusion that we should have seen coming if the second act didn't do some deflection away from it.

So...it is, once again, a dark time for the galaxy. If we were to believe The Force Awakens, a lunatic fringe of Imperial survivors led by Supreme Leader Snoke (Andy Serkis) is trying to gain control over the Galaxy from the Resistance, who brought Peace and Order to the Galaxy...at one time, at least. A new recruit, Rey (Daisy Ridley) who has an unnaturally strong connection to "The Force", spent the previous episode becoming embroiled in Rebel matters and, personally, set out to find the One Man who might bring things to a peaceful conclusion, the legendary Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill). When we left the last movie, Rey was imploringly holding out Luke's light-saber to him.
But, wait...(there's going to be a lot of that, so get used to it). It seems things are not going so good in the Universe, after all. The rebellion of General Leia Organa (the late Carrie Fisher, who has a lot to do here and is extraordinarily good doing it) doesn't seem to be quite in the control we were led to believe. They are evacuating their rebel base, just at the point the First Order jumps out of hyper-space to stop them. General Hux (Domhnall Gleason) gives orders to fire on the base...and then gets a bit distracted. He's got the rebels dead to rights and when he has the opportunity to deliver a death blow, he doesn't. The Supreme Leader isn't very pleased and literally mops the floor with him. I couldn't blame him. A plot-point will come up later that might explain why they let the Good Guys jump to light-speed, but that might be too charitable. They had a chance to wipe them out, but they didn't (perhaps because if they did, as Hitchcock liked to say, "we wouldn't have a moooovie") Once the jump is made, we go back to where we left off.

The ocean planet of Ahch-To, with a convenient couple of islands on it. We reprise the scene where Rey gives Luke his light-saber. There's been a lot of internet speculation about what his first words would be. I won't spoil it. But his reaction is perfect.

Hamill's Luke Skywalker here is an interesting character, and, bless his heart, every time Hamill is on-screen, he makes the most of his time. I will try to be as spoiler-free here as possible, but Johnson gives you a reason why Luke would have run away...to this particular spot, and why he chooses to remain there at a time when worlds might be crumbling. A lot of echoing of sentiments about the Jedi Knights in the prequels is made and, frankly, I find them legitimate. I have no issues with anything Hamill or his character do in this film...although it will cause a fair amount of hysterically feverish pixels being tossed about on the internet. It is an interesting story arc for a character who usually has to be convinced to do the right—if toughest—thing.
But, back to the rebellion—the optical wipes are done quite well and done in the obvious manner that they should be, given the series' origins in "Buck Rogers" serials. There is much breast-beating done about the escape as Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac, who loves doing this stuff, you can just tell) has used the opportunity to destroy one of the First Order's super-dreadnought ships, using possibly the silliest of the Rebel fleet's ship designs—bombers...in space. There's a lot of laser fire typically going on in these dog-fights, and no small share of individual ships blowing up. So, why oh why, would you create a ship-design with ready-to-blow-up bombs on it that you have to situate over the other ship (necessitating getting close to them) and then "dropping" them in gravity-less space. Oh, I know. X-wings make turns—one brakes and does a drop-behind maneuver, as well—TIE-fighters growl like baby tigers in soundless space, but...oh man, this is really dumb. Of course, given the fact that they're dumb ships with a dumb plan, they have a lot of casualties, and Poe is demoted by Leia from Commander to Captain for good reason. Off to the next convenient rebel base, they travel.
On Snokes' ship, the same thing is going on—the Supreme Commander dresses down Hux and brings in Kylo Ren (Adam Driver, who continues to be terrific in a tough, tough role), who, after being read the riot-act by Snokes ("...and TAKE OFF that ridiculous helmet!" he snarls) is given the task of pursuing the Rebels. This is accomplished by one of the two new wrinkles in "Star Wars" arcana—tracking the fleeing ships through hyper-space (that would take a LOT of signal strength, but wait, it gets better). The rebels are nearly out of fuel (fuel? Has anybody ever mentioned "fuel" in Star Wars before?) and jump back into real space...they have enough for a short jump, but that's about it. It's a good thing the First Order can't track them through...oh, wait, there they are. And for the second time, the Rebels are sitting ducks. What does the First order do? Kylo takes a bunch of TIE-fighters out and cut down their defenses and ships as much as possible. Then, after having done that...they stop.
Why do they stop? Hux starts to pick off transport ships one by one...whenever the mood strikes him, I guess. This gives a chance for Finn (John Boyega) and a new character, Rose Tico (Kelly Marie Tran), a chance to go gallivanting to the planet of Canto Bight to find a particular kind of "cracker" who can disable the tracking device on the lead First Order ship (they only have the one tracker installed, it seems). So, while Finn, Rose, and BB-8 go looking for that, Hux very...slowly...attacks the transports.
Now, with three fields of story going, the film starts to do some very judicious cross-cutting, as, having been stymied by her encounters with Luke, Rey begins to be contacted by Kylo Ren aaaallllllll the way across the Galaxy, enticing her to join the Dark Side of the Force. Just like tracking a ship through hyper-space, this must take a lot of energy, too. But, you've got to bridge the space- and story-gaps somehow, so...go with it. It gets interesting. But, it doesn't necessarily make things better. It does move the plot along—that's basically the first 45 minutes of the movie and it's 152 minutes long, making it the longest film in the series. As you can imagine, things get complicated.
And, at that point, I shut up. To say anything...ANY-thing else in particular will spoil what joys any Star Wars fan (or any nuance any NON-Star Wars fan) will enjoy in watching this movie. It is the second part of a Star Wars trilogy. New characters will appear—particularly Laura Dern's Vice Admiral Holdo and Benicio del Toro's rapscallion DJ (I wish there was more of him in the movie)—and because it is supposed to be a bit darker than the other entries, some characters will not make it through the movie. Some...like DJ...will just disappear. On the other hand, there are some interesting call-backs from past films, which will soften some of the blows for the die-hards.
A friend admitted recently that they'd never seen "a Star Wars." Well, this one is no place to jump in. It is, legitimately, it's own story—it has a beginning, middle and end with no cliff-hanger other than the whole thread of how everything gets resolved. But, this one has so much back-story, I can't recommend this as a good starting point. You'd get lost without, at least, seeing VII: The Force Awakens, and then, the first trilogy and the prequels, in that order. But, that's a lot of studying to do for something that's supposed to be entertainment. I've had job training that lasted less than that would take.

Snoke gets in your eyes...
 
The other thing (for die-hard's) is that whatever you're expecting—and more importantly, if you THINK you know what's going on—you're wrong. Enormous things happen in this, and some aspects, questions, origins...will simply be dropped without resolution or a tidy explanation. This will frustrate some. Not me. I took rather a perverse joy in it. Hey..."Sith" happens. As the character DJ says at one point, "Good guys. Bad guys. Made-up words."
I like that. But, I'm still having problems with the villains. I think they're not much of a threat. They're not as vicious as they should be—the whole movie teeters on the fact that they just don't go in blasting everything and bloody end the rebel threat. I don't find them credibly motivated. And Kylo Ren?  Driver pulls it off, but he has to be the most un-readably vague villain that there is. He is constantly in conflict, wanting to be like his grand-pappy Vader, but always spouting about "forgetting the past, destroying it." Dude. Has anybody played back what you're saying to you? What do you want, Kylo? What's the game-plan? Hell, what's the end-game? What are you trying to accomplish? I hope Episode IX tells us that he's suffering from a midi-chlorian overdose and prescribed some Alderaan Adderall. He may be the most pitiable bad-guy since Wile E. Coyote.
So...good? Bad? I dunno, is there an "ambivalent" side to the Force? The Last Jedi is clearly better than The Force Awakens. It takes chances. It takes chances that will upset people (ya know, like the prequels). It goes places people won't expect...to a purpose I don't think the producers have figured out yet. But, I hope the philosophy is in the same vein as this film, not going the safe route despite the lapses it took to get there. One must keep in mind that Star Wars was made to be a "gee-whiz" "Buck Rogers" adventure story with grit and texture. One mustn't take it too seriously. Up, you must grow...ye-ees.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Star Wars, Episode VII: The Force Awakens

The Family Curse
or
The Emperor's New Clothes

No, really, it's quite good. Why wouldn't it be? It's Star Wars with a new cast...with the added nostalgia of the old cast. J.J. Abrams did this before with the re-boot of Star Trek,* and he's pulled off the same Jedi mind-trick here (and remember that those work on the weak-minded or the slavishly fannish), but the end-result is very entertaining and frequently moving (as I am also slavishly fannish—I cut the original trilogy a lot of slack and acknowledge it for taking a lot of story-telling risks, even if they weren't communicated in the best manner).

But, it is basically the same story as the first movie or, as it's known now, Episode IV. We start on a desert planet but it's not Tatooine. We have more "vital information" loaded upon another droid. We have a multi-tiered battle over a large battle station but it's not The Death Star. We have The Force (in various shades). We have a hero who abandons their dull hard-scrabble life for a hero's path. We have a mystical guide. And a not so mystical mentor (in fact, it's the same guy). We have a bad guy with bad history. And we have family drama and sacrifice. And droids and creatures. A restaurant scene, not a bar scene. But, it's Star Wars all over again. One expects a bit more than a simple re-hash. There are, however, some aspects where it improves things.
It's a politically correct Star Wars. A riskier Star Wars. A Star Wars that shows some progress. It's not a Star Wars from a white kid from the 60's with good intentions. This Star Wars is a bit more inclusive. And I like that. It's natural for a galaxy of such bio-diversity (which has been one of the series' charms from the beginning) to not quite be so "white-boy"-centric—the last vestiges of its creator's 1950's origins are packed away as if from "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away." There's room for girls who don't necessarily want to be princesses. There's room for a storm-trooper who's not so weak-minded so that he rebels from the evil work he's become a part of.** But it's still a sci-fi-fantasy/fairy-tale polyglot of good intentions and evil desires; Grimm by way of Campbell. And Tolkien. And Herbert. And westerns. And Kurosawa

And Lucas.
Abrams has kept the blast doors so solidly sealed on the details that to reveal anything beyond what has been seen in trailers WOULD spoil things—because it's so familiar. Not much has changed in the 30 years since The Return of the Jedi. It is a dark time for the galaxy...again. Space is just not big enough for there to be harmony. There is still a schism in the scheme of things. The Empire hasn't completely died out with the death of Emperor Palpatine. A new order called The New Order led by another Force Lord named Snoke (played by Andy Serkis with a large holographic presence) is ostensibly in charge, but the commanders (like General Hux played by Domhnall Gleeson) are in charge of operations creating terror through the galaxy with another Doomsday Weapon (the name of which is culled from an old Star Wars draft).
A rebel pilot named Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) is on a secret mission to try and find Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill, of course), the last Jedi Knight who has gone missing, which is something of interest to both warring factions; the Order, to do something bad with him (it's never explained exactly what) and the Rebels, because he is the brother of their General Leia Organa (Carrie Fisher, also, of course). Something's up and where Luke fits into it all is a mystery. Abrams keeps things very vague. There are a lot of missing pieces throughout the movie, but as this is planned to be a trilogy, I'm sure we'll find out who's related to whom in the next one, and the third one will have another Doomsday Machine (as that's how the pattern seems to be again). This is merely the set-up for the story. The story will come a bit later.
It is amazing to see an actor of Oscar Isaac's gifts committing so fully to the Star Wars world.
Dameron gets what he's looking for, but, due to an Order attack, he secretes the information vital to the Rebellion in his R-2 unit...no, sorry, it's the BB-8, a rolling droid that gathers no moss, but does gather a lot of interest from the bad guys. The wandering droid falls into the possession of Rey (Daisy Ridley), a nomadic scavenger of useful parts from hulks of Imperial flotsam of past wars littering the landscape of the desert planet of Jakku. Not Jakée. Jakku.
Rather than sell the little guy, she keeps him, and that puts her right in the cross-hairs when the Imperials come looking for it. She is joined in the escape by another character with interests in running away from the Order, Finn (or FN-2187 played by John Boyega), a former storm-trooper who, in a moment of conscience, has his own personal rebellion and has helped Dameron escape to the planet. Together, Rey and Finn must find out the mystery hidden in BB-8, while keeping under the Imperial radar.
Sound familiar? It should. But, even with the template cemented firmly in place, to go beyond what is said already will just spoil the joys that TFA does offer. And they are considerable. Familiar, but considerable. Abrams and writer Lawrence Kasdan (The Empire Strikes Back, The Return of the Jedi, Raiders of the Lost Ark and writer-director of a lot of fine non-genre pictures) know what worked with the other films, and what didn't work and they cherry-pick the ones that have that comfort-food level. Things are contrasted between the high-tech functioning First Order and the dusty, held together by Hutt-spit and restraining bolts cast-offs used by the rebellers. Nothing ever fails for the bad guys; things have to be jerry-rigged by the good-guys...or they depend on Faith...or The Force. All of the Vietnam metaphors of the Lucas' vision still remain 30 years after the fact.
And that's just it—it's Lucas' vision. The series became a hit, then a phenomenon and Lucas futzed with it, trying to make it "just so," with digital effects, fewer ambiguities in morals (like Han shooting first) and a tortured consistency that was unnecessary when his "Star Wars" was just a scruffy independent film that stuck out like a bantha in the desert of glossy but deficient Hollywood product (those of us from "the old times" remember that the only reason theaters were "forced" to take "Star Wars" in 1977 was so they could get a lock on the Holiday release of The Other Side of Midnight—which eventually went begging for theater screens because Star Wars was still playing on them...six months later).
Different planet/same vision.
What Abrams brings to the party is the same thing he brought to the re-booted Star Trek: energy. Cameras are not so locked down. Now they swoop and glide and dance around everything, but at least with an identifiable dramatic editing logic that keeps events and relationships tied together, making them discernible even in the most vertiginous circumstances. A little of that goes a long way, but the movement allows the movie to breathe a little and seem less static than the Lucas versions.
And here's where I come in: unlike initial reviews, I don't see this as the Second Coming of Star Wars. There are flaws galore for those who want to see them. The script is not much—a watered down wine in the old bottle, albeit played with energy by both newbies and veterans. Casting is an Abrams strength—he pulled off a miracle with the new Star Trek cast—and the new SW performers are a joy to watch and they do more than the scripts warrants in establishing the new characters. Daisy Ridley has the necessary pluck and a good set to the jaw when she's determined, but we really never know who she is, and why she's so good at what she does in the film is left a mystery. A really big one. John Boyega is terrific as the renegade storm-trooper Finn and he makes the most of some of the funnier lines in the film just by his own agitated reactions to the situation he finds himself in. Oscar Isaac is one of our best actors these days, and one of the joys of The Force Awakens is seeing him commit so fully to the theatricality the Star Wars Universe demands of its actors. It ain't method acting—it's "story-book" acting where you have to walk the tight-rope of being just a little over-the-top, but not being camp.
No "Trekkian" lens flares this time. But Abrams is awfully fond of rooster-tails here.
That's the good guys. The bad guys are a bit...un-formed for now. Chief of them is Supreme Leader Snoke (Serkis), who is only seen as an elephantine hologram image. Why he's important other than a figurehead is not known. The "Governor Tarkin" of this one is General Hux (Gleason), who seems practical, even though he's still imperially dumb enough to put all his eggs in one Death-star (they're in the future, why does everybody have to LIVE on the Galaxy's most powerful weapon so it's easy to take everybody out by blowing it up—have we learned NOTHING in 30 years?)
Then, there's the Chief Bad Guy, even though not in status. That would be Kylo Ren, the mystical arm of The First Order, who yields that Excaliburian light-saber, and who holds a "deep, dark secret." It's certainly not pent-up rage, as he tends to make a light-sabered mess of any room he has a hissy fit in. And he has them whenever something doesn't quite go his way. He's a "kill-the-messenger" kinda guy. Played by Adam Driver (in a way you wish Hayden Christensen had played Anakin Skywalker), his is the most interesting story in the film, much as Darth Vader's was in the rest of the movies. Funny how it's always the bad guys...
But the big draw for film-goers is the "old guard:" Hamill's Luke Skywalker is barely in the movie (he's not even on the posters), and Carrie Fisher**** has a bit of screen-time, though not much. It's Harrison Ford's movie, as he steps back into the Han Solo role that endeared him to so many fans. He's a bit more genuinely "scruffy-looking" than previously, and he wobbles a lot when he runs, but it's the story of Han Solo that's the most intriguing instance in the movie—not so much for what he's doing now (he's back to smuggling because...well, that's part of the story that should be kept secret)—but for what he's become. The script and role in it must have meant enough to Ford that he plays it fairly straight—he was doing a lot of exaggerated mugging when last we saw him in Jedi—he didn't really want to be there, and had actually asked that Han be killed off in Episode VI. He was politely refused. But, he came back for this one, probably because apart from Rey and Finn, it's his story, with a natural continuation to his character. It should come as no surprise to anyone that the smart-alecky rogue of the first film should become something of a fair-weather father. But, there is one major change. Throughout the trilogy, Han Solo was the Doubting Thomas in regards to "The Force." Here, Abrams gives him one of his strongest close-up's in the film when he admits to being a living witness*** (and it's done at approximately the same location on the Millennium Falcon).
"It's true. All of it. The Force. The Jedi. They're real."

Han, we hardly knew ye. Ultimately where you land on The Force Awakens depends on what you think constitutes a "good" Star Wars film. The movie is no good without your prejudices (the opposite from how you'd approach a new and wholly original film, with no preconceived notions). Just the way fans of the James Bond films will argue who's a better Bond—the rough ones or the male-model ones—or where in the film "the gunbarrel" should go, or what tone the film should adapt (very serious or jokey, Skyfall or SPECTRE?), it all depends on the one you saw first, or the one you associate most with the series. Do you see the Star Wars series as "kids' films," the way Lucas envisioned his "Flash Gordon with dirt" or do you want them without an ounce of cute—A New Hope or The Empire Strikes Back
For me, I can see why people like The Force Awakens—and why the initial reviews were so rapturous. It IS entertaining, on the flashy surface level. It zips and zooms the way you thought the old movies did, but now when you look at them, you wonder "why is it so slow?" Memory is its own Jedi mind-trick. But this new one held no surprises for me. I'd seen this movie, but with a different cast, and back then, it was totally new. Now, it's a 40 million dollar business holding, and the investors are going to take the safest route by providing what they think their property is and guessing that's what its target audience wants. The result, unfortunately, will be the same path that Marvel takes, by doing their best work on new assets but coasting on what is already established as crowd-pleasers. The difference is "Star Wars" is a very small Universe, built on recycled materials that are already familiar. There are other stories to tell given the foundation of the fantasy landscape that Lucas established. But, given all the toiling done on The Force Awakens, it seems they will only scrape the surface, eroding what was once fertile ground. The result will be more desert planets, and as one of the characters said of his in the first film, it will be farthest from the brightest spots of its potential.
* Despite overhauling the look, feel, and cast of Star Trek, Abrams still felt the need to include the sentimental favorite from TOS—Leonard Nimoy's Mr. Spock.
 
** The storm-trooper are still problematically disposable, falling over like the white ten-pins they resemble.
 
*** Of course, a lot of the waggish fan-boys had a field day with that line...

**** Fisher—as always—had the best line about doing another Star Wars movie thirty years later: "Oh, it was just the same, only we're a lot meltier." That's right up there with my favorite shot of hers at Lucas' merchandising: "Every time I look in the mirror I owe George a quarter!"