
Throughout his career, as actor, producer and director, Charles Robert Redford, Jr. has seemed to choose projects that were personal and conflicted. You look at movies he starred in like Downhill Racer and The Way We Were and The Candidate, with their gilded, privileged (we use the word "entitled" these days), clueless protagonists, and you see the man playing the parts rebelling against the "easy" "golden boy" persona, trashing it, criticizing it, while also, to be truthful, personifying it. Redford was just too much the California golden boy, smart and handsome, to have it rough getting parts in movies or on stage—so he picked carefully.* He chose anti-heroes in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, Jeremiah Johnson, and Tell Them Willie Boy Is Here. And although his acting range was limited, his determination to challenge himself, and his boyish good-looks-image early in his career is also reflected in his choices as a director. Carefully, precisely, he picked material that wasn't easy...and true to form scored gold with his very first effort. He must have been very pleased, then probably questioned why he won it and became very determined to do something completely different.
Redford has never been complacent, even when he's made very complacent movies. One gets the idea that he goes into each movie, sparkly-eyed, wondering how much damage he can do with the project, upsetting the status quo.

It proved both a blessing and a curse, it took Redford eight years of careful choosing to find a second effort that might top the first.


Simple story simply told. With McLean's way with words managing to make a successful transition to the projected image and a shimmering soundtrack.





Redford's next film is a true-life historical drama based on one of the great miscarriages of justice done in the name of national tragedy and patriotic fervor: the trial and hanging (the first of a woman by the U.S. Government) of Mary Surrat after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln (her crime was that she owned the boarding house where the would-be assassins met) It's clearly meant to be addressing the knee-jerk trash-canning of basic principles of jurisprudence in the face of the 9/11 attacks ("Military tribunals" and indefinite incarcerations without charges), but, doing so while taking a lesson from the failure of Lions for Lambs, cushioning it with an example from the past. Whatever the reason, it is one of those stories you wonder why it had never been made before.
There is a definite lack of suspense here and one finds the LaBoeuf character a bit superfluous (and annoying—as do most of the characters), but legendary scenarist Lem Dobbs manages to keep the radicals' portion of the script taut and weighted with irony and melancholy, if one does get confused one in a while with all the aliases flying by. But, what a cast: Redford, Sarandon, Nick Nolte, Stephen Root, Sam Elliott, Richard Jenkins, Brendan Gleeson, Chris Cooper, Stanley Tucci, and Julie Christie. It may not mean anything to younger viewers—but, then, neither do the events about something called a "Vietnam War" and "student radicals"—as the rebels find themselves having to deal with the consequences of adapting those very values they were fighting against in the first place. Not a bad little conceit.
** The young child actor who plays Craig Sheffer's character as a boy is one Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
*** A noble goal but maybe not a profitable one—come to think of it we haven't heard anything from them lately (Parkland is one of theirs).