Showing posts with label Nick Kroll. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nick Kroll. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Don't Worry Darling

Perfectly Frank (Without Benefit of Distraction)
or
Who's Afraid of Olivia Wilde?
 
"You have a lovely home," murmurs Frank (Chris Pine) as he's welcomed to a dinner at the Technicolor dream-house of Jack and Alice Chambers (Harry Styles, Florence Pugh). And of course it is. It's a vision of America right out of TV sit-come 50's-60's, where the wives wear make-up all day, make a multi-course meal and go skipping to the door with a drink in their hand to greet the man who's come home from work...of an unknown and not-talked about nature.
 
It's a man's world, even if the shows made a pretext that the woman was secretly in charge (Really, do you think that Elizabeth Montgomery's all-powerful witch Samantha would really put up with ad-exec husband Darren's boobish "Sam, I'm the man of the house and what I say goes" before turning him back into a chimpanzee?) And Jack and the rabbit-holed Alice live in a cul-de-sac community in a desertish sub-division surrounded by mountains. The husbands drive off in their dream-cars, while the women do their house-work, listening to lectures by Frank about achieving the dream-existence, the perfect life, outside of the chaos everybody else puts up with. The men are off working on Frank's "Victory Project" off in the mountains doing...something...but every so often their world is rocked by temblors, which are dismissed with an off-hand "Boys with their Toys" remark to go back to sunning themselves and sipping their scotch-and-sodas.
It's all as fake as the blue on Jack's business-suit, but nobody questions it. Nobody asks questions. Life is good. Don't rock the boat (even if the ground does rock from time to time). At the neighborhood ballet class, the mantra is "there is beauty in control, grace in symmetry, we are as one". But there are cracks showing up in the veneer of this world just like the cracks in the sun-baked asphalt of the community streets.
Little things, like the rumor about the neighbor who walked outside the Victory City limits with her son, and only she returned. I mean there were the "Warning! Employees Only Beyond This Point (Hazardous Materials)" signs, that are ubiquitous beyond the trolley route (the trolleys have signs that say "What you See Here/What You Do Here/What You Hear Here/Let's Let It Stay Here") and the bad dreams that Alice has of dilating eyes and chorus-girls in Busby Berkley-like dance routines—that turn nightmarish. Sometimes, the eggs that Alice cooks for her Instagram-perfect meals are empty. Walls start closing in during the daily cleaning, to the sound of Frank's "Shatnering" (Pine really gets into it a couple of times).
And then, there's the plane. Alice sees it—a vintage red prop-plane—that flies overhead one day, shimmers in the air, and starts to spiral down into the hills surrounding the enclave. Alice runs out into the desert, past the warning signs, up to the prominent hill where "the boys" go to work and bangs on the structure trying to get help for the crashed passengers, but, no one answers her call. Instead, a bunch of beefy security guys in red suits appear out of nowhere and haul her away...to be corrected...before returning her back to the neighborhood.
Just what is going on in Don't Worry Darling, Olivia Wilde's sophomore directorial effort (after the hilarious and hyper Booksmart) is teased for the first 2/3 of the movie with the too-slick veneer of the film constantly being smudged by the encroaching feeling that something is "terribly, terribly wrong" (as they say in the "True Crime" docs)...but what? Is it the demands of satire, or some Shyamalanian twist that will sneak up on you at the end? Don't Worry Darling is full of incident that makes you wonder what's real, what's a dream, and what's a delusion while rarely giving you a focal point of where the truth lies.
We've seen this game-plan before. "Wandavision" did it recently. For those with more media savvy, there are doses of The Matrix and The Stepford Wives with doses of "The Twilight Zone"(s), "Black Mirror," and "The Prisoner" TV show (both versions, in fact) mixed in. It has the disadvantage of being feature length (half-hours are ideal) with the burden of wrapping things up at the end (which it does, probably not to everyone's satisfaction...but, as a "Prisoner" fan, I don't mind a little ambiguity), but doesn't take the cop-out of cliff-hangers, or taking the "X-Files" route of just ending without explanation. 
But, it also hints at elements in "the real world" (such as it is) like any "no, really, we're helping YOU" cult—along the lines of Synanon, EST, Scientology, Jonestown and Trump-land—that promises some sort of fulfillment, when the only thing that's being filled is the leader's bank account (we never know Frank's last name...it could be "Ponzi"). One could see it as a comment on "crazy cures" and conspiracy theories and their influence on a gullible, privileged society—it certainly fits—especially in regards to people who spend endless hours watching the latest News from Wackyland (or long-winded movie reviews) on their computers. Don't Worry Darling is merely an extension of that.
But, with all those references to hold a broken mirror up to, there is one more comparison to a movie (based on the play) that I want to make—Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Both films deal with the lengths—bordering on control games and shared illusions—that a troubled and failing couple might go to in order to maintain the relationship, whether for personal need or in order to just maintain a semblance of an easier status quo. There is desperation there and Don't Worry Darling maintains a constant feeling of desperation...and unease.
The third act also has some desperation problems, as well—trying to create an action-filled third act (which, unfortunately, undercuts some of the movie-logic needed to gird the film), but as long as one isn't a stickler for continuity's sake, one will find Don't Worry Darling a finely crafted tale of "disturbia" with impeccable direction and design—the music choices are inspired and John Powell's music, superb—all supported by a plucky "in-every-frame" performance by Florence Pugh that is brave, believable, and, at times, horrorific. The movie is worth seeing, just to see her.*

* Notice I haven't mentioned any of the garbage about the premiere publicity from the entertainment press and (worse) social media? The reason is it's worse than irrelevant, it's distracting. Which, in a wonderful irony, only makes the movie's point.

Tuesday, October 5, 2021

The Addams Family 2

Oh, *Snap* *Snap*
or
National Lampoon Addams Family Family Vacation Negation
 
I've made plain my life-long love of "The Addams Family" especially the TV-series based on the macabre New Yorker cartoons of Charles Addams (not the worst source for a TV show...), which, for its short two year run, did a running black satire of family sitcoms—credit to Nat Perrin, who'd worked with the Marx Brothers and who knew "funny."

Attempts to revive the characters have been monstrously uneven whether in film, TV revivals or cartoon series. The best result was Barry Sonenfeld's film Addams Family Values, which managed to combine satire—and not sitcom-satire, real satire—and clever writing to make a wicked little movie on many levels. 
 
The same could not be said for 2019's The Addams Family, a CGI-animation version that knew exactly what it was supposed to do...but couldn't make it funny. With that title, you could immediately guess that cleverness was not going to be the spark that animated the thing to life.
 
Well, now everybody's back with...The Addams Family 2. Its biggest joke might be the "Submitted for Your Consideration" ad come Oscar-time.
Oh, technically, it's all fine. CGI being what it is these days, something (like, say, a waterfall) has to be really dodgy for it to be noticed. It's just that there is a sense of rote-ness to this, a feeling that the ambitions are so slim, the characters so known, that any effort besides the obvious isn't attempted, and in fact is avoided, lest it fall out of a PG category and betray the lack of sophistication expected in animated films. There's no shock, no envelope-pushing, and no sense of the black humor emblematic of the original Addams work in The New Yorker.
This one, like the last, focuses on Wednesday Addams (Chloë Grace Moretz), who is going through all sorts of growing pains. For her school's science project, she's developed a way to transfer tendencies from one being to another (ala Freaky Friday (both of them) and God knows how many other films and television shows)—in this case, she transfers her pet octopus' higher brain functions to her sweet but diminished Uncle Fester (Nick Kroll). Fester will, as the film progresses, take on more and more octo-tendencies, which the family doesn't really notice too much (which is odd but not funny). Wednesday's work is noticed by a mad scientist named Cyrus Strange (Bill Hader, surprisingly uneffective) who would like to know her methodology, which she refuses to divulge as "a family secret." 
This starts a plot where Strange sets up a plot to convince the Addams Family that Wednesday was switched at birth with another child (as the joke that Addams used for Wednesday was that she resembled her mother this makes little sense and they have to do extra work to get past DNA issues). As Wednesday is already feeling estranged from her family, this sets too well with her, but not the others, and Gomez suggests they go on a family road trip to see the worst of America (planned stops are Salem, Sleepy Hollow, Miami, San Antonio, The Grand Canyon, Death Valley, and...Sausalito). If one did a little more research—or just had the cajones to risk offending people—they could have found a LOT of places to go.
It's not a lot of fun—there were two lines that made me laugh: When the family sits down to dinner, Fester starts to dig in and Morticia chastises him: "Fester, wait for the children..." to which he replies "I thought we were having CHICKEN!" And at a detour to Niagara Falls, Morticia asks Wednesday "Having fun, dear?" To which she replies "I'm looking at Canada, if that answers your question..." (just the phrasing of that I liked). There's also a nice shot of Gomez being so depressed, he can't even cradle his head on his hands. "Thing" has to do it. It's at the bottom of the review, as it graphically encapsulates how I feel about the film.
The cast does a good job for all they're asked to do: Oscar Isaac is the proper amount of latin dash as Gomez, but Charlize Theron seems to be under the impression that Morticia went to Bryn Mawr. Chloë Grace Moretz has the largest role as Wednesday, but doesn't do much to sell the humor of her depressed daughter, and Nick Kroll does a fine imitation of Jackie Coogan's TV Uncle Fester, but with considerably more saliva. And why the producers thought the sonorous butler Lurch would, when he sings (!!!), have a high singing voice I have no idea, but they do it. He sings "I Will Survive" which isn't funny and makes little sense story-wise.
But, then, that passes for the best you can expect from this milquetoast Addams Family series, which is the wrong format for the wrong audience and betrays and negates the peculiar charms of Addams' original work. It should be staked, coffined, chained, and buried 12 feet deep in salted, sanctified Earth never to materialize in this incarnation again.

Wednesday, October 16, 2019

The Addams Family (2019)

Altogether Ooky (And I Don't Even Know What That MEANS!!)
or
"Are You Unhappy, Darling?" "Oh, Yes, Yes! Completely"*

I've written about how much I loved "The Addams Family" (both as a 1960's TV show and as a concept from Charles Addams' series of macabre  New Yorker cartoons from 1932 to his apparent death in 1988), and the rather "iffy" attempts to continue the perverse charm in Barry Sonenfeld's feature films and TV spin-off's. There's been a Broadway musical (that I know nothing about) and there were rumors a few years ago that Tim Burton was working on a stop-motion version—which might have been interesting. Burton might not have been entirely faithful to it, but he would have captured the spirit and the schtick that made the old series so enjoyable (as opposed to the watered-down "Munsters" that appeared on CBS at roughly (very roughly) the same time.

Well, that would have been interesting. And probably far more enjoyable than the latest re-boot of The Addams Family, written by Conrad Vernon, Pamela Pettler, Matt Lieberman, Erica Rivinoja and directed by Vernon and Greg Tiernan.
Kudo's to them for designing it closer to Addams' original conceptions (although they don't always make compelling characters—their version of Addams daughter Wednesday is particularly bland) and there are some rare body-snatches of Addams original material—like the line (*) in this post's title. But, the whole thing is barely enjoyable, particularly because some of the voice-casting is underwhelming, with the exception of Oscar Isaac's "Gomez" and Nick Kroll's "Uncle Fester."
But, there's also less emphasis on the family dynamics and more on their "otherness" from somewhat ordinary citizenry. That tactic has always been dull—unless the "normals" were weirder than the Addamses—and usually the least intriguing part of any "Addams" story. How many gawping reactions can you get before it gets old and starts decaying before your eyes? And this version of "The Addams Family" has an awful lot of that.
The film begins with the wedding of Gomez (Isaac) and Morticia (Charlize Theron—she tries, although the role would be better suited to another cast-member, Allison Janney) attended by the Addams Extended Family, but it gets interrupted by locals with torches and pitchforks—ordinary people are turned murderously monstrous by what they fear (now where have we seen that before?)** Escaping with Fester (Kroll) and "Thing" (their literal hand-servant), the joyously gloomy newly-weds head for their honeymoon in New Jersey (State Motto: "What Are YOU Looking At?), where they run down an escapee from an asylum for the criminally insane, who turns out to be Lurch (muttered by director Vernon), who will become their beloved man...er...creature-servant. Trying to return him to the asylum, they find the facility closed (by police tape), abandoned, and haunted. But, for them, it's merely a lovely fixer-upper dream-home to raise a family—but not from the dead—and put down gnarled roots.
Morticia is mortified that Wednesday starts to show interest in bling
"But, darling, pink is a gateway color!"
Cut to thirteen years later. The Addamses have an older daughter Wednesday (Chloe Grace Moretz) and son Pugsley (Finn Wolfhard, busy young man). Wednesday, full of woe, has grown rebellious ("But, darling, you have all the horrors of home right here!") and Pugsley is approaching an Addams right of passage. No, it's not a Bat Mitzvah (but thanks for going there), it's a Mazurka, in which he must demonstrate his prowess as a warrior with the Addams Scimitar. That's not Pugsley's style—he's more of an expert in explosives—and Gomez fears that, despite his worst efforts, Pugsley will be an embarrassment to the Family coming to witness the momentous event. This sentiment seems un-Addamsish.
Meanwhile, gentrification also challenges The Addams Family. At the base of their escarpment their mausoleum is perched on, a development has cropped up, sponsored by the Home, Art, and Garden Network (HAG-TV) and its principal make-over star, Margaux Needler (Janney). As if to push the point a little too far, the name of the town is "Assimilation," and the movie is consumed with her efforts to get rid of the eye-sore that sits in the cross-hairs of Assimilation's picture-windows.
Margaux stops by to give the Addams House a make-over.
The hair may be a political point.
Oh, there are good lines—at one point Wednesday runs away from home, insisting on going to public school (rather than "cage-schooling") and she's asked if she wants to go to the Mall to which she replies "Sure, I haven't seen a good mauling in ages"—but, it's relatively simple to get laughs out of Addams contrariness. The very fact that they're a morbid bunch makes them a natural anathema to normalcy and rife with satirical possibilities aimed at white picket fences. But, this version is a little too desperate to find them. And bludgeons them like a wooden stake.
There's an awful lot of music humor—too much of it—Lurch plays "Green Onions" on the organ and, at one point, "Everybody Hurts." It's a little weak. And it has the annoying habit of going back to the well of the TV-show for dread-cred, rather than stake out new territory. The film-makers make too much of a big deal of the pet lion (in the TV series, did we see that twice?) Did we really need an animated version of the TV-show's theme song that matches the live version to the last detail? Can't this be its own "thing" (so to speak?) without cleaving so close to the source? Are we to reduce the Addams Family to being a horrid cliche, with the very first movie in a re-boot series?
I know it's a children's movie and all, but the group who made the "Hotel Transylvania" films had a better coffin-handle on the material than this weak effort has. 

Maybe I'm a little too close to the source, but, after watching this, I had a normal urge to go down to Lowe's and get a cart full of torches and pitch-forks.


*
** Short Answer: "Everywhere"
"That's 'It', Folks!"

Saturday, September 22, 2018

Operation Finale

Herr Kaptor and the Architect
or
"They Pop Up Everywhere, Like Mushrooms After the Rain"

Years and years and years ago, I read "The House on Garibaldi Street," written by former Mossad chief Isser Harel detailing the capture of "The Last Nazi," Adolf Eichmann, the SS "obersturmbannfuhrer" appointed (by Reinhard Heydrich) with the job outlining the transportation of Jews to concentration camps as part of the Nazi "Final Solution," becoming known as "The Architect of the Holocaust". Eichmann managed to use the confusion of the post-war era to escape from Germany to Austria and then on to Argentina through the use of forged papers and heavily greased palms. But, after the war, he became the focus of a man-hunt by Holocaust survivors, where his presence in Argentina became known. Although more concerned with Israel's internal security, Harel was persuaded to undertake the capture of Eichmann—assassination was not considered after the execution of others, whose identity as Eichmann had not been verified—to bring him to Israel for trial. Shin Bet agents were dispatched for positive identification and only after it was determined they had their man, another team was dispatched to capture him and transport him back to Israel. 
Sounds relatively easy. But, like any good "Impossible Mission," there will always be complications, especially given an undertaking of this sort. International boundaries are crossed. Foreign agents are in a foreign land. The extraction of a citizen amounts to kidnapping. Then, there are bureaucratic details that must be overcome, which, given the nature of the mission, can seen to be so much red tape, especially when there are lives on the line. It only complicates an already complicated situation, which adds to the drama. It's a natural for dramatization.

"The House on Garibaldi Street" was made into a television film in 1979. American network TNT made a TV movie called "The Man Who Captured Eichmann" with Robert Duvall and Arliss Howard. Now, along comes Operation Finale, written by Matthew Orton (based on "Eichmann in my Hands," written by Shin Bet operative Peter Malkin) and directed by Chris Weitz (he of American Pie, About a Boy, The Golden Compass, and Twilight: New Moon) as a sort of passion project and goes into some of the more interesting details as well as the psychology of the team on the mission. It's based on Malkin's book, so Malkin is the focus, that cause not being hurt by the fact that one of the producers is Oscar Isaac who plays Malkin.

Operation Finale begins on a woman's face looking at us from the screen; she is the sister of Peter Malkin, killed by SS troops as she attempts to hide in the woods with her children to keep them from the slaughter. Malkin sees this as he looks in the mirror, shaving, a memory, an imagining of the event that haunts him and drives him. And gets him in trouble. Malkin doesn't have a good reputation with Shin Bet; he's been demoted to training other agents after a German living in Argentina is shot for war-crimes in a case of mistaken identity. Other agents don't trust him and are only too quick to tell him that. But, he still burns to go back in the field, even if the Mossad is less concerned with Nazi-hunting than they are with current threats to their border. Better fending off future threats than avenging the ones of the past. 
And something has come up in Argentina, which is starting to go through a surge of heightened anti-semitism and white nationalism. Nazi's have nothing to do with irony, so no one ever stops to think that it might be strengthened by the fact that the country is harboring fugitive Nazi's. Of course, the country is in danger of being infiltrated by outsiders because a German ex-patriate told me so.

But, just when the hunting stops, life intrudes with one of those little happenstances that defy the most careful planning and derails the most entrenched of secrets (it's why conspiracy theories are usually wrong—the truth will out, and if it doesn't, it isn't truth*). The daughter (Haley Lu Richardson) of a Holocaust survivor, Lothar Hermann (Peter Strauss), starts to date a young man names Klaus—Klaus Eichmann—and things go far enough that Klaus is invited over for dinner and Hermann, who is half-Jewish (he was sent to the camps for being a socialist) is able to play along with his suspicions about his young dinner guest, who has definite antisemitic views—"The Jews, they pop up everywhere, like mushrooms after the rain" (you could say the same thing about Nazi's, eh?)—and is proud of his father's service in the SS. Lothar asks him if he's still alive and young Klaus says that, no, he was killed during the war and he actually lives with his uncle, who is also from Germany.
It's enough for Lothar to contact Israeli authorities that he may have found a link to Adolf Eichmann, but the Mossad are dis-interested, due, not only to their current security concerns, but also that the source of the information, Lothar Hermann, is blind, due to the many beatings he endured at the Dachau work camp.

Although the Mossad is slow to pursue Eichmann, there are factions that won't let it rest and plans are drawn up for an investigation to be led by Harel (Lior Raz) to, first, contact the Hermanns so that they can survey the house and maybe capture a photograph of the "uncle" to see if it is Eichmann, and, if his identity can be confirmed, send another team in for a "snatch and extract" to take Eichmann back to Israel to stand trial for war-crimes. Because Malkin has messed up in the past, agent Zvi Aharoni (Michael Aronov), a meticulous researcher is sent first to Argentina to determine the identity of "the uncle" and get photographs, if possible. Aharoni doesn't like Malkin, and would be just as glad if he didn't have anything to do with the assignment, but Malkin is assigned to do the extraction, if it comes to that.
Back in Argentina, Klaus and the daughter, Sylvia, have broken up—he'd invited her to a get-together of friends, which turns out to be a gathering of Nazi sympathizers, whose main agenda for the evening is big talk about exterminating Jews. Sylvia runs away in horror. But, it provides an opportunity for the Shin Bet agents to use her to get more information by pretending to a reconciliation. Sylvia goes to the Eichmann home on Garibaldi Street where she meets "the uncle," whom Klaus, during a heated moment calls "father." The uncle is actually Eichmann.
The second team, which includes an old flame of Malkin's, Dr. Hanna Elian (Melanie Laurent)—she is a fictionalized version of a male doctor enlisted to drug Eichmann to get him on the plane out, presumably to add an emotional element to the story—each take their own route to Argentina, set up a safe-house in which to house their intended captive, and monitor Eichmann's activities. True to an SS officer's form, his schedule is like clockwork ("a human metronome" as Malkin calls him), taking a bus every morning to his job as a supervisor at a Mercedes Benz plant, returning at night to home and family.

But, like any best-laid plan, or intricately-timed spy mission, things can get changed, no matter how steady the target. When Eichmann's regular bus comes and goes, the SS man isn't on it. It turns out, Eichmann has missed the first bus after his shift by the merest of caprice—he stands watching, fascinated, at a flock of birds making intricate patterns in the sky during a feeding frenzy. Tense minutes tick by, as the agents wonder what might have gone wrong. Just when they're about to abandon the activity for the night, the next bus arrives and Eichmann's on it. The Israeli's regroup and Malkin takes the lead, walking toward Eichmann and saying the merest of distractions—"Uno momentito, senor"—then grabs Eichmann in a choke-hold, covering his mouth and immobilizing him, while the other two agents rush to assist. Eichmann has only a moment to let out a yell—heard by his wife (Greta Scacchi) preparing dinner—before he is carted off to a waiting car.

Mission accomplished.
But, getting him out of Argentina undetected is another matter. A planned El Al flight is postponed—for ten days—and with a bureaucratic caveat—they must produce a letter, signed by Eichmann, giving his consent to be extradited to Israel. It's an insane request, but one that has to be met if the agents are to leave the country with their captive. What motivation could possibly compel Eichmann to sign what amounts to a confession and permission for his trial and probably execution? They have ten days. What do they do? Talk about your mission: impossible.
There then becomes a race against time as the agents in the safe-house try to persuade Eichmann to agree to sign the extradition paper and keeping their composure with each other knowing that they have ten days to do it, while at the same time, outside, the Argentinian crypto-nazi's, who learn of Eichmann's disappearance (from his son), do a very thorough search for him throughout the city. Those ten days are tests of will among the participants, as the Israeli's, who naturally vilify Eichmann, must take care of him and keep him healthy, while also trying to coerce him to sign what amounts to his death warrant...or they can't leave. And Eichmann is a tough study: "This guy convinced rabbi's to load the trains!" one of them points out, when there's a moment of underestimating him.
This sounds like it would be unremittingly grim, but it, surprisingly, isn't. The script is smart, often witty, and darkly ironic. Director Weitz knows his thriller playbook very well, and manages to improve on some standard tropes keeping them fresh and taut, cross-cutting increasingly fast between the safe-house and the groups looking for it, and there is a particularly deft camera-tango for a restaurant scene where exchanges are made. It is accompanied by something that's becoming quite rare in films these days—a great, showy score by the increasingly dependable Alexandre Desplat that gets under your skin and ramps up the tension while being melodic, as well. It completes a package that makes Operation Finale feel more like it's out of the classic era of film-making and films where there is less emphasis on flash and more on the good presentation of ideas.

Adolf Eichmann on trial in Israel: "The Man in the Glass Booth"

* Or, in simpler terms, "Man conspires and God laughs." Plus there's the predilection that if somebody does something, they're going to want it be known. Just Mark Felt.