The Set-Up: The Kubrick Trap. There are those who see it as a maze, but it is usually more lethal than that. People don't just lose their way...they're constantly being threatened with losing themselves...or their lives. The machinations that threaten to grind the souls in Kubrick's movies take many forms: they may be societal or social—political systems, class systems—military, technological, even supernatural. They may even be hard-wired into the folds and curves of the protagonists' grey-matter (talk about your mazes!). And the people who populate in the chess-master Kubrick's films are merely pawns to those designs.But even pawns can occasionally take a King.
Rarely.
Because I don't talk about Stanley Kubrick enough,* I'll be eventually putting up some scenes from Kubrick films that show those traps being set. This one is one of the best, from an early film in Kubrick's career—Paths of Glory—a controversial** small-budget film set during World War I, for which Kubrick had the luck to get a star the caliber of Kirk Douglas to star.*** Paths of Glory tells the story of one attack that goes wrong, slipshod in planning and impossible in execution. The general whose idea it was to launch it in the first place is outraged and humiliated that the troops could not pull it off. And so he decides to set an example by court-martialing and executing members of the troop. He cynically decides that he will bury the evidence, blaming the men for the failure, and blustering his demands for satisfaction. He has the power and he will use it. In the chateau headquarters of the generals, the war is a game of advancement, and General Mireaux will not fall on his sword for anyone.
This meeting, directly after the attack, is a triangulation between strata of power—Mireaux will dress down his subordinate, Dax—in command of the troop—in front of the older, craftier General Broulard, who serves as referee, negotiator and Master of Ceremonies. Broulard is a political animal in the military game, assuaging egos, keeping his eye on both The Big Picture and his ambitious subordinates. Far from the front, he specializes in watching his back. He is the master manipulator by not choosing sides—other than his own. Mireaux, however, is a martinet—vain, egotistical and callous, seeing the war as a personal stepping stone for advancement and his greater glory. Dax, on the other hand, is literally in the trenches, making due with the situation as it is handed to him. Orders are orders, but orders come from men and men are flawed.
But you can't say that. Not to the men who control your life...and see lives as disposable...and a means to an end. So, Dax is in the uncomfortable position of being caught between the men who depend on him and the men who don't care. He is fighting two fronts: the simpler fight at the trenches with a common enemy with its deadly consequences, and the more complicated political fight above, with the men who control all Fates.
The fight for the Ant Hill done (a spectacular sequence, shot with only two simultaneously running cameras), Kubrick concentrates next on the fallout, away from the close-quarter muddied trenches and the chaos of the battlefield, in the immaculately airy rooms of the Neoclassic French headquarters that don't look like they've ever seen the destruction of war. Kubrick stages it literally for its triangulation (as he will stage the subsequent court-martial as a chess-match). The set-ups reflect the politics and advantages of the argument and the participants' relative position in it. Isolating medium shots of individuals. Close-ups for emphasis. Bonding two-shots (if one can call it bonding).
The editing more closely follows reactions than words (as usual, with the Sunday "Scene" we put the dialog only contained in the individual shots, and here the dialogue is pointedly broken up, emphasizing the visual rather than the dialog), eyes darting from one man to the other searching for political advantage, seeking the important "two against one." Even when Mireaux is at his most emotional ("For cowardice!"), Kubrick is focusing on the reactions of Dax and Boulard, the former surprised and outraged while the latter looks away, betraying a slight embarrassment at the out-burst and Mireaux's lack of civility. Kubrick saves his most looming close-up for Broulard, who must finally rein in Mireaux's self-pitying melodrama ("I was talking of [executing] a hundred men. Now we're down to 12.") for the sake of a compromise that neither of the other two parties is comfortable with.
And the dialogue is blunt, direct and brutal...but not without insinuating nuance. A product of Kubrick, Calder Willingham and early Kubrick collaborator Jim Thompson—he of the brutal pulp fiction novels, including The Killer Inside Me—it reflects Thompson's ability to see the worst in people and have them express it without their having any sense of self-examination or discretion—the ultimate in ego, bordering on pathology. The frankness of the dialogue—despite the political under-pinning that restrict it—has a tension all its own; add Kubrick's insistence on focusing on the reactions to it and you have a very full, very tense scene of one-ups-manship. Production will be starting soon on Lunatic at Large, a "lost" Kubrick project,**** written by Thompson in the late 50's.
The Story: The French attack on The Ant Hill, an insignificant scrap of land save for advantage and the vain-glorious ambitions of General Mirieuax (George Macready) has not gone well. Led by Colonel Dax (Kirk Douglas), the infantry were cut down almost immediately—some of the men not even able to leave the trenches. Incensed, Mirieuax even attempted to have French guns fire on the troops to provoke them. The aftermath of the battle is a debriefing and dressing down of the Colonel by Mirieux in the luxurious headquarters of General Broulard (Adolphe Menjou), both mens' superior and a particularly political military man.
Action!
DAX: Penalty of death? -
MIREAUX: For cowardice!
MIREAUX: That's just about enough out of you.
DAX: Well, I'm not going to mince words and stand by when--
MIREAUX: Colonel Dax...
BROULARD: I believe the colonel has a point, even though he makes it rather bluntly. This is not a trial...
MIREAUX: Latitude is one thing, insubordination another.
MIREAUX: We're not talking about the past. We're talking about the present.
MIREAUX: ...it up to the men to decide whether an order is possible or not.
MIREAUX: If it was impossible, the only proof of that would be their dead bodies lying in the bottom of the trenches.
[Broulard scoffs at the notion]
DAX: I'm perfectly serious.
BROULARD: Well, now, Colonel, you're missing the point entirely. We don't want to slaughter the French army. All we want to do is to set an example.
DAX: Oh, well, if it's an example... DAX: I'm perfectly serious.
BROULARD: Well, now, Colonel, you're missing the point entirely. We don't want to slaughter the French army. All we want to do is to set an example.
DAX: ...you want, then take me.
BROULARD: Take you?
DAX: Yes, sir. If it's an example you want...
DAX: ...one man will do as well as a hundred. The logical choice is the officer...
BROULARD: Well, that's very reasonable of you, Paul.
MIREAUX: Will that be...
BROULARD: Oh, I won't be there, Paul.
DAX:...if it's at all possible...I'd like to be appointed counsel...
MIREAUX: I'll take the matter under consideration.
BROULARD: Oh, we can permit that here, Paul.
DAX: Thank you, sir.
BROULARD: Well!
MIREAUX: George, I'm afraid the colonel won't have time.
Paths of Glory
Words by Jim Thompson, Calder Willingham and Stanley Kubrick
Pictures by Georg Krause and Stanley Kubrick
Paths of Glory is available on DVD from M-G-M Home Entertainment and on DVD and Blu-Ray from the Criterion Collection.
* This is sarcasm. If anything, I talk about Kubrick and his films too much, and actually I try to avoid it, spacing them out to avoid some sort of overload.
** Because of its harsh depiction of the French military, it was banned in France—and if it was shown at Cannes, no doubt Kubrick would have been made "persona non grata," as Lars von Trier was in 2011.
*** Subsequently, Douglas, when producing Spartacus, replaced director Anthony Mann (no slouch in the directing department) with his young "find," Kubrick. The experience created a fine film, but soured Kubrick from ever again making a "Hollywood" picture again. From then on, it would be his projects with his rules.
**** Literally, it seems. Kubrick was going to film it after collaborating with Marlon Brando on the pre-production of One Eyed Jacks but Spartacus became his next project. Then, amidst his notes and papers and books on just about everything, the script was misplaced—something that Kubrick, it is reported, always regretted. I wrote the above piece in 2011. In 2010, it was reported that "Lunatic at Large" was being pursued for production with actors Sam Rockwell and Scarlett Johannson slated to star. As of 2023, nothing has come of it. Yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment